Paolo Chiocchetti (email@example.com)
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 18:34:20 +0200
These are funny answers, but I think that it would be also interesting for
everybody to face directly Peterson's critics, and to discuss them seriusly.
It would be interesting to observe the SVS-schooled children compared to the
normal-schooled children. What are the main (generalizing) differences? Brain
flexibility? Socialization? Happiness? Self-management? Jobs? Etc...
And it would be also interesting looking the consequences for a society (in
history and antropology) of more traditional and cohercitive pedagogies vs. more
autonomous, free and self-managed pedagogies.
Joe Jackson ha scritto:
> >Paul Peterson,
> >Director of Harvard's Program on Education Policy and Governance. He called
> >schools such as AVS "alarming" and said "No anthropologist anywhere has
> >found a society which would say 'The children shall decide what they want
> >to do.' Everybody has expectations for their children that are rooted in
> >the cultural traditions of that society." He also claimed that children,
> >like everyone else, will take the path of least resistance if not forced to
> >do things (such as take difficult classes).
> Sure - that's really funny. Four statements that don't relate to each
> 1: "alarming" - I find Peterson's job title alarming, but probably not as
> alarming as his assistant's.
> 2: "No anthropologist anywhere has found a society which would say 'The
> children shall decide what they want to do.'" - So in addition to knowing
> about all of the educational policy and governance, he has personally talked
> to all the anthropologists in the world, which is interesting, because I
> happen to have talked to all of the ornithologists in the world, and none of
> them have found any birds who think that Peterson is not a total idiot.
> 3: "Everybody has expectations for their children that are rooted in the
> cultural traditions of that society." - and we all know that expectations
> always help people, and that a parent's expectations of their children
> should be the prime determinate of their life path.
> 4: "children, like everyone else, will take the path of least resistance if
> not forced to do things" - Did he really say, in effect, that everybody
> always takes the path of least resistance? That's beautiful. Why is it
> that everyone knows that humans almost never take the path of least
> resistance, and yet some guy who got a phd out of a gumball machine can
> spout it like it's fact, like his personal views of humankind are somehow
> But you know what's even funnier is that every single kid in our school
> knows more about learning than all of the blowhard experts in every ivory
> league school on the east coast.
> -Joe firstname.lastname@example.org
> Visit Fairhaven School's website at
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Dec 23 1999 - 09:01:58 EST