Robert Swanson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Wed, 15 Nov 2000 22:34:51 -0800
on 11/15/00 7:10 PM, Rick Stansberger at email@example.com wrote:
> If intellect is a programmed response, what would you call the brain's innate
> ability to process information?
At seven years old the brain is a vast computer (seven times the weight of
connections as yours and mine) totally receptive to programming. Programmed
from a heart-other-welfare basis society thrives. Programmed from a basis of
competitive individual control society is endangered. We are either pro
natural order (which is huge) or we are pro contrived order (as fleeting as
the momentary glow of a firefly).
> Robert Swanson wrote:
>> Intellect is a training our minds received when they were open to absorbing
>> and incorporating any possibility. We settled into intellect as the
>> functioning status quo. It is how to communicate and get along in the world.
>> It was modeled as life by adults, media and peers, and so it became our
>> lives as well.
>> Intellect is a way of functioning. It is functioning as a programmed
>> response. This response was shaped into our behavior. It is a focus of
>> thought energy on the ability to isolate and abstract incoming information
>> and to play with that information as separate from its source. This allows
>> separate centralized operation of self as individuated from environment.
>> This egocentric self is an essential part of being human. It was not
>> intended to be the focus of our energies because it decreases chances of
>> survival. The development "intended" us is first an emotional focus of
>> heart, followed by ego development relative to the environment, then these
>> are made subconscious so that mental energy can focus on creativity.
>> Intellect enables these other functions but is not to be a dominating focus
>> to guide our lives by. That is dangerous, and incidentally, unhappy.
>> Glad to reply,
>> on 11/14/00 7:36 AM, Rick Stansberger at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>> Robert, please tell me what you mean by Intellect. I think you and I might
>>> have very different definitions of the term. And I'm sorry for being harsh
>>> with you in other messages.
>>> Robert Swanson wrote:
>>>> What is it like to dispel the curse of intellect? I am inviting a dialogue
>>>> with another (perhaps a student) willing to speak from the depths of
>>>> heartfelt congruency. It is a magical experience. Just email me personally.
>>>> We will publicize excerpts that get the point across.
>>> "Weirdness abounds and shatters our illusion of order. Heh-heh. All the
>>> dust is being blown out from under the carpet. Wonderful stuff!"
>>> Wanda Hamilton-Quinn
> "Weirdness abounds and shatters our illusion of order. Heh-heh. All the
> dust is being blown out from under the carpet. Wonderful stuff!"
> Wanda Hamilton-Quinn
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Nov 16 2000 - 16:22:03 EST