[Discuss-sudbury-model] LIST RULES RE: Sheep

Though, as administrator of this list, I ask that
discussions of politcs and political reasoning be taken
*off* list into private email. I cite rule 4, governing
conduct on this list:

> 4: All conversations must be kept at least tangentially
> related to the purpose of the list.

On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Alan Klein wrote:

> Woty,
>
> While I agree that the democratic school model is essentially non-partisan,
> I am not clear what you are saying here re your vote for Bush.
>
> Did you vote for him simply because you disagree with Jesse (which is what
> your statement implies)?
>
> Or did you vote for him because you "really have data available" (as Jesse
> put it) to justify your support of him? (If so, I would love to hear it and
> understand it.)
>
> Thanks,
> ~Alan Klein
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Woty
> On Dec 7, 2005, at 20:44, Jesse Gallagher wrote:
> > Do tens of millions of people really see positive
> > aspects of the Bush administration, for instance, that
> > we don't see? Do they really have data available to
> > them that allows them to support the multitude
> > criminal acts of this group of liars, murderers, and
> > thieves? Or are they simply uncritically thinking,
> > believing, and doing what they're told by the voices
> > in their televisions?
>
> I disagree with you about Bush. That is why I voted for him. So did
> many other people who support the Sudbury model.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-sudbury-model mailing list
> Discuss-sudbury-model_at_sudval.org
> http://www.sudval.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/discuss-sudbury-model
>

-- 
 
--Scott David Gray
reply to: sgray_at_sudval.org
http://www.unseelie.org/
============================================================
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained
by stupidity.
-- Nick Diamos
============================================================